The growing tensions largely revolve around several candidates whose eligibility is being questioned. Critics argue that some of the individuals seeking leadership positions allegedly hold dual nationality, which is considered incompatible with the legal and constitutional framework of the DRC. According to national regulations and interpretations of eligibility rules, holding dual citizenship is viewed by many as a violation when occupying sensitive national leadership roles, particularly in sports administration, where questions of loyalty and national representation are taken seriously.

In addition to the nationality debate, another major concern being raised is the residency status of some candidates. Reports and public opinion suggest that certain individuals running for positions within FECOFA have not been consistently living in the country. This absence has fueled criticism from various football stakeholders, who argue that effective leadership of a national football federation requires close presence, engagement with local football structures, and direct involvement in the development of the sport within the country.

Supporters of stricter eligibility enforcement believe that leadership positions within FECOFA should be reserved for individuals who are fully committed to the domestic football ecosystem, both legally and physically. They insist that governance of national football should reflect national identity, local experience, and consistent participation in the country’s sporting affairs.

On the other hand, some observers argue that the focus should be placed more on competence, experience, and managerial capability rather than strict interpretations of nationality or residency. They suggest that football administration is increasingly global, and that experienced professionals, even those who have lived or worked abroad, can still contribute positively to the development of the sport in the DRC.

As the election date approaches, the debate continues to polarize opinions within the Congolese football community. Clubs, officials, and supporters remain divided over what should define eligibility and leadership in FECOFA. The situation highlights broader challenges in African football governance, where issues of legality, identity, professionalism, and modernization often intersect.

With the elections drawing nearer, attention is now focused on how FECOFA and relevant authorities will address these concerns, and whether clear decisions will be made regarding the eligibility of contested candidates before the voting process begins.